Monster-Hardware Logo
  Login or Register
Real American

USA Flag

 
nukeNAV
 
Search



 
Who's Online
There are currently, 32 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are an Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here
 
Latest Forum Posts
Last 10 Forum Messages

My Best Buy Sales Experience
SABERTOOTH R2.0 BIOS MIA
SodaStream Anyone?
Tazerball
A Joke Gone Bad
Retrode Gaming
Stealth Bastard
Cooler Master HAF X
Thoughts About Bulldozer
Crucial DDR3-1600 8GB

Monster-Hardware Forums

 
Latest Reviews

· Crucial DDR3-1600 8GB
· Cooler Master HAF X
· Seagate ST31000524AS
· Logisys MS6801 Mouse
· Mitsuba DC500T 5MP
· Infrared Thermometer
· DXG-595V 5MP 1080p
· SanDisk Sansa View
· Rfrb Dell Latitude D410
· (HP) Sempron LE-1250
 
NukeSentinel
This is the list of NukeSentinel(tm) banned IP addresses.

· 110.83.52.176  - Script
· 86.57.186.219  - Filter
· 14.0.21.86  - Union
· 113.173.24.82  - Script
· 222.242.72.200  - Script
· 202.28.119.240  - Filter
· 103.241.129.13  - Filter
· 84.53.200.22  - Filter
· 66.249.79.64  - Filter
· 66.249.79.56  - Filter
· 174.139.20.146  - Filter
· 64.34.193.104  - Script
· 85.25.213.172  - CLike
· 66.249.69.16  - Filter
· 37.58.100.238  - Filter
· 173.208.193.82  - Script
· 37.58.100.87  - Filter
· 37.58.100.151  - Filter
· 66.249.79.120  - Filter
· 194.150.168.95  - Filter

NukeSentinel(tm)
 
October 31, 2011 07:35 AM PDT

Thoughts About Bulldozer

Author: JimAdkins. 6586 Reads
  Print this page   Export to PDF format   Mail to a friend


I must confess I am a long-time die hard AMD fan. In fact, I haven't bought an Intel CPU since Dinosaurs ruled the earth (It was really 1998 to be exact), but to this day I still remember fondly my ABIT BH6, Celeron @ 504 Mhz Motherboard / CPU combo. Now I don't think I need my head examined and I certainly don't think AMD chips are superior to Intel CPU the way they used to be years back. I guess it's just my nature to pull for the Underdog and I hate to see AMD run out of business. Not only would that be a tragedy for AMD and all the people who work there, but because of the impact that would have for the consumer in the CPU market. Intel would probably return to trying to sell their mainstream performance CPU for 1000+ usd. Don't get me wrong. With notebooks, tablets, and smart phones, the market has probably changed enough today so they wouldn't be able to pull it off. At the very least, though, it would mean the end of CPUs like the Core i5 2500K which probably wins the most bang for your buck award right now in the CPU market.

But even after everything I wrote above you might be shocked to learn I can't bring myself to buy a Bulldozer, and this time it wasn't for lack of funds, either, since I have been saving my pennies for its release for some time now. But as things stand right now, it is just too big, too hot, uses too much power especially when overclocked (AMD FX 8150 @ 4.6Ghz = 450W+), and is too expensive (currently sells for 279 usd at Newegg). Worst of all it performs worse in lightly threaded benchmarks than the AMD Phenom II X6 1100T it is supposed to replace. This last complaint is simply unforgivable. If you can't build a CPU faster than the one you already have on the market then you should keep with until you can. I am really hard pressed to know why AMD chose to release Bulldozer right now, as is, at all. I mean, AMD and its customers would almost certainly be better served by a simple Phenom II process shrink: It would be smaller, faster, easier to cool, and be cheaper to make. So AMD could sell it cheaper if they wanted or they could sell it for the same price as the Phenom II and just pocket the extra profit. Either way everybody wins. Release that right now instead of Bulldozer, which they should leave in the oven until it is through baking, because this is obviously an unfinished product.

Now, for all the doom and gloom I see brandished about Bulldozer, and all the venom I (a self-professed long-time AMD customer) have just spilled above, I don't see this necessarily as the beginning of the end for AMD as some others have suggested. History shows that firms in this industry can recover from a bad product launch. Just look at the GeForce 5800 Dustbuster and/or the GeForce 480 space heater fiasco: both times Nvidia learned from their mistakes, got up, brushed themselves off and went on to make and release a much better product their next time at bat. I for one am optimistic that, given enough time, money, a few re-spins, and perhaps most importantly a more mature 32 nm manufacturing process that AMD can do the same and fix most of the problems with Bulldozer. In the meantime, though, as a customer I resent being asked to buy Bulldozer as it is essentially half baked at best. The only way I can see AMD selling a ton of these CPUs is if they drastically lower the price of the six and eight core CPU in the AMD FX line, or stop selling the AMD Phenom II entirely, which I hope they don't do. IMO for all but the hardcore overclocker, it is still the star of their lineup. In fact unless something drastic changes I will soon be buying a Phenom II X6 1100T CPU for my second computer as well.



Jim Adkins



Copyright © by Monster-Hardware
All Right Reserved.


Category: None
Tags: None
Bookmark: Share/Save/Bookmark

[ Go Back ]
Content ©
Survey
What do you think about this site?

Ummmm, not bad
Cool
Terrific
The best one!
What is this?



Results
Polls

Votes 86
 
MHW Case Badges

MHW Case Badges

 
Of Interest

G-Shock

 
 

Copyright © 2001 - 2014 by Jim Adkins


Distributed by Raven PHP Scripts
New code written and maintained by the RavenNuke™ TEAM


(Original PHP-Nuke Code Copyright © 2004 by Francisco Burzi)
Page Generation: 0.09 Seconds

:: fisubice phpbb2 style by Daz :: PHP-Nuke theme by www.nukemods.com ::
:: fisubice Theme Recoded To 100% W3C CSS & HTML 4.01 Transitional & XHTML 1.0 Transitional Compliance by RavenNuke™ TEAM ::

:: W3C CSS Compliance Validation :: W3C HTML 4.01 Transitional Compliance Validation :: W3C XHTML 1.0 Transitional Compliance Validation ::